ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo evaluate the durability of protection provided by original monovalent and bivalent COVID-19 vaccination against COVID-19-associated hospitalization and severe in-hospital outcomes. DesignMulticenter case-control design with prospective enrollment Setting26 hospitals in 20 US states ParticipantsAdults aged [≥]18 years admitted to hospital with COVID-19-like illness from 8 September 2022 to 31 August 2023 Main outcome measuresThe main outcomes were absolute and relative vaccine effectiveness of original monovalent and bivalent COVID-19 vaccines against COVID-19-associated hospitalization and severe in-hospital outcomes, including advanced respiratory support (defined as receipt of high-flow nasal cannula, non-invasive ventilation, or invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV]) and IMV or death. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using multivariable logistic regression, in which the odds of vaccination (versus being unvaccinated or receiving original monovalent vaccination only) were compared between COVID-19 case patients and control-patients. Bivalent vaccine effectiveness analyses were stratified by time since dose receipt. ResultsAmong 7028 adults without immunocompromising conditions, 2924 (41.6%) were COVID-19 case patients and 4104 (58.4%) were control patients. Compared to unvaccinated patients, absolute vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated hospitalization was 6% (-7% to 17%) for original monovalent doses only (median time since last dose [IQR] = 421 days [304-571]), 52% (39% to 61%) for a bivalent dose received 7-89 days earlier, and 13% (-10% to 31%) for a bivalent dose received 90-179 days earlier. Absolute vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated advanced respiratory support was 31% (15% to 45%) for original monovalent doses only, 66% (47% to 78%) for a bivalent dose received 7-89 days earlier, and 33% (-1% to 55%) for a bivalent dose received 90-179 days earlier. Absolute vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated IMV or death was 51% (34% to 63%) for original monovalent doses only, 61% (35% to 77%) for a bivalent dose received 7-89 days earlier, and 50% (11% to 71%) for a bivalent dose received 90-179 days earlier. ConclusionWhen compared to original monovalent vaccination only, bivalent COVID-19 vaccination provided additional protection against COVID-19-associated hospitalization and certain severe in-hospital outcomes within 3 months of dose receipt. By 3-6 months, protection from a bivalent dose declined to a level similar to that remaining from original monovalent vaccination only. Although no protection remained from original monovalent vaccination against COVID-19-associated hospitalization, it provided durable protection against severe in-hospital outcomes >1 year after receipt of the last dose, particularly against IMV or death. SUMMARY BOX What is already known on this topic- On September 1, 2022, bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was recommended for US adults who had completed at least an original monovalent COVID-19 primary series. - Early estimates of bivalent vaccine effectiveness are available for the period soon after dose receipt; however fewer data exist on their durability of protection and effectiveness against severe outcomes. What this study adds- When compared to original monovalent vaccination only, bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination provided additional protection against COVID-19-associated hospitalization and certain severe in-hospital outcomes within 3 months of dose receipt. By 3-6 months, protection from a bivalent dose declined to a level similar to that remaining from original monovalent vaccination only. - Although no protection remained from original monovalent vaccination against COVID-19-associated hospitalization, it provided durable protection against severe in-hospital outcomes >1 year after receipt of the last dose, particularly against invasive mechanical ventilation or death.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , DeathABSTRACT
Background: We investigated whether abatacept, a selective costimulation modulator, provides additional benefit when added to standard-of-care for patients hospitalized with Covid-19. Methods: We conducted a master protocol to investigate immunomodulators for potential benefit treating patients hospitalized with Covid-19 and report results for abatacept. Intravenous abatacept (one-time dose 10 mg/kg, maximum dose 1000 mg) plus standard of care (SOC) was compared with shared placebo plus SOC. Primary outcome was time-to-recovery by day 28. Key secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality. Results: Between October 16, 2020 and December 31, 2021, a total of 1019 participants received study treatment (509 abatacept; 510 shared placebo), constituting the modified intention-to-treat cohort. Participants had a mean age 54.8 (SD 14.6) years, 60.5% were male, 44.2% Hispanic/Latino and 13.7% Black. No statistically significant difference for the primary endpoint of time-to-recovery was found with a recovery-rate-ratio of 1.14 (95% CI 1.00-1.29; p=0.057) compared with placebo. We observed a substantial improvement in 28-day all-cause mortality with abatacept versus placebo (11.0% vs. 15.1%; odds ratio [OR] 0.62 [95% CI 0.41-0.94]), leading to 38% lower odds of dying. Improvement in mortality occurred for participants requiring oxygen/noninvasive ventilation at randomization. Subgroup analysis identified the strongest effect in those with baseline C-reactive protein >75mg/L. We found no statistically significant differences in adverse events, with safety composite index slightly favoring abatacept. Rates of secondary infections were similar (16.1% for abatacept; 14.3% for placebo). Conclusions: Addition of single-dose intravenous abatacept to standard-of-care demonstrated no statistically significant change in time-to-recovery, but improved 28-day mortality. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04593940).
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
BackgroundImmune dysregulation contributes to poorer outcomes in severe Covid-19. Immunomodulators targeting various pathways have improved outcomes. We investigated whether infliximab provides benefit over standard of care. MethodsWe conducted a master protocol investigating immunomodulators for potential benefit in treatment of participants hospitalized with Covid-19 pneumonia. We report results for infliximab (single dose infusion) versus shared placebo both with standard of care. Primary outcome was time to recovery by day 29 (28 days after randomization). Key secondary endpoints included 14-day clinical status and 28-day mortality. ResultsA total of 1033 participants received study drug (517 infliximab, 516 placebo). Mean age was 54.8 years, 60.3% were male, 48.6% Hispanic or Latino, and 14% Black. No statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint was seen with infliximab compared with placebo (recovery rate ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.99-1.29; p=0.063). Median (IQR) time to recovery was 8 days (7, 9) for infliximab and 9 days (8, 10) for placebo. Participants assigned to infliximab were more likely to have an improved clinical status at day 14 (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.05-1.66). Twenty-eight-day mortality was 10.1% with infliximab versus 14.5% with placebo, with 41% lower odds of dying in those receiving infliximab (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.90). No differences in risk of serious adverse events including secondary infections. ConclusionsInfliximab did not demonstrate statistically significant improvement in time to recovery. It was associated with improved 14-day clinical status and substantial reduction in 28- day mortality compared with standard of care. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04593940).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , PneumoniaABSTRACT
Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of a primary COVID-19 vaccine series plus a booster dose with a primary series alone for the prevention of Omicron variant COVID-19 hospitalization. Design: Multicenter observational case-control study using the test-negative design to evaluate vaccine effectiveness (VE). Setting: Twenty-one hospitals in the United States (US). Participants: 3,181 adults hospitalized with an acute respiratory illness between December 26, 2021 and April 30, 2022, a period of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (BA.1, BA.2) predominance. Participants included 1,572 (49%) case-patients with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 and 1,609 (51%) control patients who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Median age was 64 years, 48% were female, and 21% were immunocompromised; 798 (25%) were vaccinated with a primary series plus booster, 1,326 (42%) were vaccinated with a primary series alone, and 1,057 (33%) were unvaccinated. Main Outcome Measures: VE against COVID-19 hospitalization was calculated for a primary series plus a booster and a primary series alone by comparing the odds of being vaccinated with each of these regimens versus being unvaccinated among cases versus controls. VE analyses were stratified by immune status (immunocompetent; immunocompromised) because the recommended vaccine schedules are different for these groups. The primary analysis evaluated all COVID-19 vaccine types combined and secondary analyses evaluated specific vaccine products. Results: Among immunocompetent patients, VE against Omicron COVID-19 hospitalization for a primary series plus one booster of any vaccine product dose was 77% (95% CI: 71-82%), and for a primary series alone was 44% (95% CI: 31-54%) (p<0.001). VE was higher for a boosted regimen than a primary series alone for both mRNA vaccines used in the US (BNT162b2: primary series plus booster VE 80% (95% CI: 73-85%), primary series alone VE 46% (95% CI: 30-58%) [p<0.001]; mRNA-1273: primary series plus booster VE 77% (95% CI: 67-83%), primary series alone VE 47% (95% CI: 30-60%) [p<0.001]). Among immunocompromised patients, VE for a primary series of any vaccine product against Omicron COVID-19 hospitalization was 60% (95% CI: 41-73%). Insufficient sample size has accumulated to calculate effectiveness of boosted regimens for immunocompromised patients. Conclusions: Among immunocompetent people, a booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine provided additional benefit beyond a primary vaccine series alone for preventing COVID-19 hospitalization due to the Omicron variant.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory InsufficiencyABSTRACT
Background: The loss of smell and taste in COVID-19 patients is now acknowledged as one of the disease's primary symptoms.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To characterize the clinical severity of COVID-19 caused by Omicron, Delta, and Alpha SARS-CoV-2 variants among hospitalized adults and to compare the effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to prevent hospitalizations caused by each variant. Design: A case-control study of 11,690 hospitalized adults. Setting: Twenty-one hospitals across the United States. Participants: This study included 5728 cases hospitalized with COVID-19 and 5962 controls hospitalized without COVID-19. Cases were classified into SARS-CoV-2 variant groups based on viral whole genome sequencing, and if sequencing did not reveal a lineage, by the predominant circulating variant at the time of hospital admission: Alpha (March 11 to July 3, 2021), Delta (July 4 to December 25, 2021), and Omicron (December 26, 2021 to January 14, 2022). Main Outcome Measures: Vaccine effectiveness was calculated using a test-negative design for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to prevent COVID-19 hospitalizations by each variant (Alpha, Delta, Omicron). Among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, disease severity on the WHO Clinical Progression Ordinal Scale was compared among variants using proportional odds regression. Results: Vaccine effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines to prevent COVID-19-associated hospitalizations included: 85% (95% CI: 82 to 88%) for 2 vaccine doses against Alpha; 85% (95% CI: 83 to 87%) for 2 doses against Delta; 94% (95% CI: 92 to 95%) for 3 doses against Delta; 65% (95% CI: 51 to 75%) for 2 doses against Omicron; and 86% (95% CI: 77 to 91%) for 3 doses against Omicron. Among hospitalized unvaccinated COVID-19 patients, severity on the WHO Clinical Progression Scale was higher for Delta than Alpha (adjusted proportional odds ratio [aPOR] 1.28, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.46), and lower for Omicron than Delta (aPOR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.77). Compared to unvaccinated cases, severity was lower for vaccinated cases for each variant, including Alpha (aPOR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.49), Delta (aPOR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.51), and Omicron (aPOR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.85). Conclusions: mRNA vaccines were highly effective in preventing COVID-19-associated hospitalizations from Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants, but three vaccine doses were required to achieve protection against Omicron similar to the protection that two doses provided against Delta and Alpha. Among adults hospitalized with COVID-19, Omicron caused less severe disease than Delta, but still resulted in substantial morbidity and mortality. Vaccinated patients hospitalized with COVID-19 had significantly lower disease severity than unvaccinated patients for all the variants.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 progression can be accompanied by a "cytokine storm" that leads to secondary sequelae such as thrombosis and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Several inflammatory cytokines have been associated with COVID-19 progression, but have far too much daily intra-individual variability to be useful in tracking the course of the disease. In contrast, we have shown that the inflammatory biomarker {gamma}' fibrinogen ({gamma}' Fbg) has a 6-fold lower coefficient of variability compared to other inflammatory markers such as hs-CRP. Objectives: The aims of the study were to measure {gamma}' Fbg in serial blood samples from COVID-19 patients at a tertiary care medical center in order to investigate its association with clinical measures of disease progression. Methods: COVID-19 patients at a tertiary care medical center were retrospectively enrolled between 3/16/2020 and 8/1/2020. {gamma}' Fbg was measured using a commercial ELISA. Results: Our results showed that nine out of the seventeen patients with COVID-19 had extremely high levels of {gamma}' Fbg. {gamma}' Fbg levels were significantly associated with the need for ECMO and with mortality. Conclusions: We found that COVID-19 patients can develop extraordinarily high levels of {gamma}' Fbg. The previous highest {gamma}' Fbg level that we are aware of was 80.3 mg/dL found in a study of 10,601 participants in the ARIC study. These results have several important clinical implications. {gamma}' Fbg contains a high affinity binding site for thrombin that binds to anion-binding exosite II on thrombin and protects it from inactivation by heparin. High levels of {gamma}' Fbg therefore provide a reservoir of heparin-resistant clot-bound thrombin when the {gamma}' Fbg is clotted. These findings have potential implications regarding prophylactic anticoagulation of COVID-19 patients and suggest that heparin prophylaxis may be less effective than using other anticoagulants, particularly direct thrombin inhibitors.
Subject(s)
Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Thrombosis , COVID-19ABSTRACT
Objective: To determine absolute and relative risks of either symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection for late cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Methods: We conducted a retrospective double-cohort study of patients with either symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection [COVID-19(+) cohort] and its documented absence [COVID-19(-) cohort]. The study investigators drew a simple random sample of records from all Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Healthcare patients (N=65,585) with available COVID-19 test results, performed 03.01.2020 - 09.13.2020. Exclusion criteria were age < 18y and no established OHSU care. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. All-cause mortality was the secondary outcome. Results: The study population included 1355 patients (mean age 48.7 {+/-} 20.5 y; 770(57%) female, 977(72%) white non-Hispanic; 1072(79%) insured; 563(42%) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) history). During a median 6 months at risk, the primary composite outcome was observed in 38/319 (12%) COVID-19(+) and 65/1036 (6%) COVID-19(-) patients (p=0.001). In Cox regression adjusted for demographics, health insurance, and reason for COVID-19 testing, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with the risk of the primary composite outcome (HR 1.71; 95%CI 1.06-2.78; p=0.029). Inverse-probability-weighted estimation, conditioned for 31 covariates, showed that for every COVID-19(+) patient, the average time to all-cause death was 65.5 days less than when all these patients were COVID-19(-): average treatment effect on the treated -65.5 (95%CI -125.4 to -5.61) days; p=0.032. Conclusions: Either symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with increased risk of late cardiovascular outcomes and has a causal effect on all-cause mortality in a late post-COVID-19 period.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Death , Cardiovascular DiseasesABSTRACT
Unique characteristics like large surface area, excellent conductivity, functionality, ease of fabrication, etc., of graphene and its derivatives, have been extensively studied as potential candidates in healthcare applications. They have been utilized as a potential nanomaterial in biosensor fabrication for commercialized point-of-care (POC) devices. This review concisely provided innovative graphene and its derivative-based-IoT (Internet-of-Things) integrated electrochemical biosensor for accurate and advanced high-throughput testing of SARS-CoV-2 in POC setting.
ABSTRACT
Background: As SARS-CoV-2 vaccination coverage increases in the United States (US), there is a need to understand the real-world effectiveness against severe Covid-19 and among people at increased risk for poor outcomes. Methods: In a multicenter case-control analysis of US adults hospitalized March 11 through May 5, 2021, we evaluated vaccine effectiveness to prevent Covid-19 hospitalizations by comparing odds of prior vaccination with an mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) between cases hospitalized with Covid-19 and hospital-based controls who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Results: Among 1210 participants, median age was 58 years, 22.8% were Black, 13.8% were Hispanic, and 20.6% had immunosuppression. SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 was most common variant (59.7% of sequenced viruses). Full vaccination (receipt of two vaccine doses at least 14 days before illness onset) had been received by 45/590 (7.6%) cases and 215/620 (34.7%) controls. Overall vaccine effectiveness was 86.9% (95% CI: 80.4 to 91.2%). Vaccine effectiveness was similar for Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, and highest in adults aged 18-49 years (97.3%; 95% CI: 78.9 to 99.7%). Among 45 patients with vaccine-breakthrough Covid hospitalizations, 44 (97.8%) were at least 50 years old and 20 (44.4%) had immunosuppression. Vaccine effectiveness was lower among patients with immunosuppression (59.2%; 95% CI: 11.9 to 81.1%) than without immunosuppression (91.3%; 95% CI: 85.5 to 94.7%). Conclusion: During March through May 2021, SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines were highly effective for preventing Covid-19 hospitalizations among US adults. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was beneficial for patients with immunosuppression, but effectiveness was lower in the immunosuppressed population.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The outbreak of COVID-19, a profoundly contagious disease has unnerved the world in a calamitous manner from diverse aspects. The present study ventures to expand the literature by exploring loneliness, social isolation, risk perception, financial distress, and psychological distress amidst the lockdown phase of the general population of Bangladesh. METHODS: Through an online survey among 474 respondents (between April 17th and April 23rd, 2020), data were collected from the Bangladeshi residents (21 years or above). Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were conducted using IBM Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) and Warp-PLS. RESULTS: Findings suggest a strong positive correlation among the factors and social isolation, risk perception, financial distress are manifested as the predictors of psychological distress. Besides, females, aged people, and lower-income group are found to be more psychologically distressed. CONCLUSION: This study yields new insights into the psychological facets of a lower-middle-income earning country, Bangladesh.
ABSTRACT
The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has created a large problem to the healthcare system all over the world. Retest Positive for SARS-CoV-2 from recovered patients (COVID-19) has been reported recently which raised several questions for the COVID-19 disease. In this case report, we had described a patient who became positive after 1 month from the initial infection with SARS-CoV-2. It is therefore possible that recurrences should be actually persistent infections in which PCR resulted falsely negative during initial infection when he left home isolation assuming himself disease free. The discharge criteria should be ensured for a recovered patient to prevent the relapse or persistence of COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
This report describes survey findings of adult inpatients and outpatients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection.